|Bigio v. Coca Cola
United States District Court for
the Southern District of New
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.
Edward L. Sadowsky Nathan Lewin
Andrew M. Zeitlin Grant R. Vinik
Tenzer, Greenblatt, L.L.P Miller, Cassidy,
The Chrysler Building Larroca & Lewin, L.L.P.
405 Lexington Avenue 2555 M Street, N.W.
New York, New York 10174 Washington, D.C. 20037
(212) 885-5000 (202) 293-6400
Of Counsel Attorneys for
May 20, 1999
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Counsel for Appellants hereby certifies that on this 20th day of May 1999, I caused to be placed in first class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Appellants Reply Brief addressed to:
Richard Hans William M. Dreyer
King & Spalding Coca-Cola Company
1185 Avenue of the Americas Coca-Cola Plaza
New York, NY 10036-4003 P.O. Drawer 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
Carolyn Clark Campbell, Clerk
U.S. Court of Appeals
1702 U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B), Counsel for Appellants certifies that the Appellants Reply Brief contains ________ words.
|Page 6 of 6
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6